
We frequently perceive all waterfowl migration to be synchronized with the conspicuous movements of familiar species like Snow Geese, Tundra Swans, and Canada Geese—big flights coming south in October and November, then a return to the north in late February and March. And we’re all quite aware of the occurrence of large gatherings of some of these migrants while they make stopovers on some of our largest lentic (still) waters—the man-made lakes and reservoirs created by damming local streams. But did you know that there are populations of colorful waterfowl with dynamic migrations that extend throughout the winter and early spring with movements that are often continuous. Under favorable conditions, these birds favor the lotic (flowing) waters of the river and its larger tributaries as they transit the lower Susquehanna valley. That’s because unpolluted lotic freshwater ecosystems support a greater diversity of plants and animals than lentic waters, and therefore offer more opportunities for hungry migrating waterfowl to find food. Let’s have a look at some of the species that visit the river during their seasonal journeys…

















Prior to the nineteenth century, the low-gradient flow regime of the river both above and below the riffles at Chiques Rock (lower right on map) created prime wildlife habitat. The natural accumulations of nutrients and substrates carried into and through the lotic waterway’s pools and riffles were cycled into an ideal growing medium for extensive mats of American Eelgrass and other aquatic plants. This underwater forest hosted a seemingly endless abundance of invertebrates and fishes (both resident and migratory)—supporting a variety of consumer species including various populations of humans. But soon after the mass clearing of much of the watershed’s land for farming and lumber, the mill ponds created by dams constructed on streams to power saw and grain mills became brimful with sediments eroded from the unprotected ground. During storm events, torrents of these sediments then flowed full bore toward the Susquehanna, and began accumulating in the low-gradient segments of the river.











Despite being located in the transfer zone, the lower Susquehanna has become a significant depositional zone along much of its length, mostly courtesy of the placement of sediment-trapping man-made dams.
Following construction of the mill dams and ponds on nearly every mile of the lower Susquehanna’s low-gradient tributary streams, enterprising parties moved on to the river. The first significant spans were constructed using wide timber cribs filled with large rock. They were placed to create water deep enough to allow canal boats to cross the Susquehanna at both Clark’s Ferry at the mouth of the Juniata River in Dauphin County and at Columbia/Wrightsville. These dams also diverted water into the newly excavated canals: the Pennsylvania Eastern Division Canal (completed in 1833) which followed the river’s east shore from Clark’s Ferry to Columbia, and the Susquehanna and Tidewater Canal (completed in 1840) along the west shore from Wrightsville to Havre de Grace, Maryland. Placement of these sediment-trapping man-made dams began a process of converting vast mileage of the lower Susquehanna from a transfer zone into a deposition zone. In addition, layout of the canals and locks followed the contours along the base of the riverside ridges, seriously altering most of the alluvial terrace wetlands that the river had created as a feature of its floodplain during the post-glacial period.
Construction of the canal dams was just the beginning. During the twentieth century, more massive dams would be added to the main stem of the river for hydroelectric energy production at York Haven, Safe Harbor, Holtwood, and Conowingo. Upon their completion, the days of unassisted anadromous fish migrations were over. On the river and its tributaries, smaller low-head dams maintain water levels for boating and recreation, but still function as current diminishing pseudo-lentic waters that blanket the lotic riffle and pool substrates with polluted sediments.
MAN-MADE DAMS TURN LOTIC WATERS INTO UNFLUSHED TOILETS






TIME TO CLEAN UP OUR ACT
WHERE DOES YOUR STORMWATER GO?

RIPARIAN BUFFERS MAKE A DIFFERENCE…WIDER IS BETTER

FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION


“STOP HEMMING AND HAWING AROUND ALREADY”
“HEY COWBOY, HOW ‘BOUT GETTIN’ THEM FILTHY LITTLE DOGIES OUTTA DAT CRICK?”

“ATTABOY TEX, THAT’S MORE LIKE IT!”

AND FINALLY,…
…WHEN IT COMES TO BUILDING DAMS ON LOTIC FRESHWATERS—…

COMING SOON…























































































































































